Thunderpole Tank Whip

The place to talk about specific radios, equipment and accessories. Do you prefer the latest generation of rigs and antennas or do you like the classics? Discuss it here!
HotWheels
Regular
Regular
Posts: 76
Joined: 31 Dec 2010, 19:01

Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by HotWheels »

Anyone tried or using a Thunderpole Tank Whip?

I was thinking of getting one for static dx if they are any good or should I stick to my Sirio 4000 Megawatt...

Obviously they are only good for static dx'ing on the hills what I'm after really...

any help gratefully received..

Andy
User avatar
jaybranch
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 496
Joined: 23 Nov 2010, 21:33
Location: Newcastle (GB3NT or GB3TW)

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by jaybranch »

I'e heard great things about these.... maybe someone who actually has one can confirm though!
73 & 88

Image
Image

26TM1979


AOR3000A
Yupiterus (a lot!!)
VX-7R
Lowe HF 150 & 225
TS850 SAT
A longwire & GR5V
User avatar
forager
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 210
Joined: 22 Jan 2009, 14:50
Location: Barnsley, South Yorkshire.

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by forager »

Do a search for tank whip, there is loads of info on this forum! I've a sirio hp 4000, i've done a test and the tank whip performed better by an s point or so. Worth getting though in my opinion, nothing much can go wrong, just a 2 piece section, bulletproof, cheap enough too . . hth
Matt
26-TM-150
User avatar
26FB156
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 131
Joined: 07 Sep 2009, 19:05
Location: Stoke on Trent
Contact:

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by 26FB156 »

I have one but i haven't had an opportunity to use it yet. It comes in 2 sections and is definately a static mobile only aerial.
73,
Ian 26FB156 26TM329 26CT156
076DX
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 202
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 20:00

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by 076DX »

They can be a bitch to swr on magmounts.
Don't expect it to blow your 4000 outta the water coz it won't.

The 4000 are a very good antenna....
User avatar
Corblimeyguvnar
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 2708
Joined: 08 Nov 2008, 20:37
Call Sign: 26TM097
Location: New Forest

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by Corblimeyguvnar »

'Tank' whips are a good bit of kit, mine was from Capital, around £15.

No problem on the mag mount, but as stated, not a huge difference from the 4000.
User avatar
Adriano9966
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 3526
Joined: 07 Jul 2008, 22:13
Location: Banbury Oxfordshire

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by Adriano9966 »

:D I have two of these but I will agree with the above posts about it being a static only antenna it would work mobile too but it would need to be mounted low down on the vehicle say for example the back bumper bit of a drag factor though

static mobile personally I think it takes some beating as most mobile antennas for 27mhz are based on a full quarter wave anyway
if your using it for hf ham radio as well as cb its probably a good idea to replace the top section for other bands eg carry three with you for 12/11/10 metres dont know how it would work on 15 but I cant see why not

:lol: when its mounted on the cars roof dont be surprised if you get funny looks from people in passing cars due to its enormous lenth

:D I have had some real success with this antenna and I would reccomend it
User avatar
Mudslinger
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7491
Joined: 28 Jul 2010, 07:11
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by Mudslinger »

Mine SWR's ok on a magmount as well. The SWR is very flat across 27Mhz

Performance wise, I can't tell any difference between it and my Modulator.
Mudslinger - Simon
26TM274
26CT612

There is no such thing as a Fidelity 1000 which is too good to scrap.
User avatar
northern35s
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 3780
Joined: 02 Dec 2009, 16:09
Location: Blackpool

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by northern35s »

The best bang for buck for a commercial mobile antenna, cheap as chips, and mine has worked fine on the roof of my car, I initially had it on a Wilson mag without problem at speeds up to 40 Mph.

The 1/4WL whip has a better current distribution than a base loaded whip, however if we insert a high Q coil into the centre of the antenna we can raise the current further up the antenna, by doing this we move it away from the lossy earth as the antenna capacitively couples to the bodywork of the vehicle and the ground around it, the further we can move the current away from this the better, see images below.

Base loaded vertical

Image

1/4WL vertical

Image

Centre loaded vertical

Image

The best form of loading is via a capacity hat, where we can create an almost linear capacity distribution along the whole length of the antenna, but capacity hat and mobile antenna don't often go hand in hand, that said, I've driven with a rather large capacity hat atop my screwdriver and 5' whip :shock:

The best place to mount the antenna is in the centre of the roof, any part of the antenna that is shrouded by the vehicle ie. when mounted on the boot or bumper, becomes inefficient and increases ground plane losses.

A whole shed load of info here:

http://www.k0bg.com/
Mobile DXing from the car and on foot
User avatar
t140pete
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 271
Joined: 01 Jan 2011, 14:38
Location: Lancashire

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by t140pete »

Does a capacity hat change the resonant frequency of the antenna ? (i.e. would the whip need shortening to accommodate the extra electrical length ?)

I may have to experiment :)
26 TM 349
User avatar
freelander2
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 160
Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 22:35

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by freelander2 »

076DX wrote:They can be a bitch to swr on magmounts.
Mine is a bit of a git to SWR on my magmount on a freelander, still not got it right, but my mates, on a landy series 3 works VERY well indeed.

As stated, can't knock it for the price, certainly worth a squirt.
Midland 42 Multi, Alan Spkr Mic, Magmount & Mini Springer, Sharman 9' Tank Whip, Thunderpole Voyager.
Bearcat 3500xlt & Watson 881 Supergainer.
2xBinatone 950 pmr446
User avatar
northern35s
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 3780
Joined: 02 Dec 2009, 16:09
Location: Blackpool

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by northern35s »

t140pete wrote:Does a capacity hat change the resonant frequency of the antenna ? (i.e. would the whip need shortening to accommodate the extra electrical length ?)

I may have to experiment :)
Yes, remove the upper whip completely, If I fit my large cap hat to the lower section of the tank whip it is resonant across 11m, in fact it is very wide band, which is another characteristic of a cap hat, it isn't the most mobile antenna with the cap hat fitted, as my cap hat is made from two twisted strands of solid copper wire (lighting cable stripped and twisted), it's good for 40 Mph though.

Pic below is my tank whip lower section and cap hat mounted on top of my screwdriver antenna, this is my mobile 40m special :D

Image
Mobile DXing from the car and on foot
User avatar
26TM944
Radio Addict
Radio Addict
Posts: 864
Joined: 28 Feb 2011, 14:19
Call Sign: 26TM944
Location: Bletchley
Contact:

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by 26TM944 »

Greetings.

I have the Roadking (2 piece version) and that works a treat on the hatch mount when static mobile. I've not yet tested on the mag mount, but I don't think they'll be much in the two mount as the hatch mount is at the top of the tail gate at the back and the mag mount would live about 10" forward of that.

SWL across the bands is well within 1:1.3 for most of a megahertz centred around 27.5.

I would say that the stinger and modulator are both beaten by this 102" whip - however it is not very practical mobile! I can image taking a lot of car parking florescent tubes out with this ;-)

Many years ago when I was *younger* I had an Avanti Powerstick - the white 102" solid whip - not the one with the tunable top end - and it was great - but can I find it now? Not a chance.

I used that mobile all the time on the boot of my mk2 escort!

73

Steve
26TM944
076DX
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 202
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 20:00

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by 076DX »

The best 'all round' antenna imo is the Predator 10-k which I use.
I have done side by side tests with the tankwhip and no difference.

Mine is the big single coil version and i've tested it out against various antennas with a mate parked up beside me.

The good thing about it is the low swr and fantastic bandwidth,will work from low 26 right into 10 meters with no adjustment.
Will also take serious amounts of power if you are that way inclined ;)

Definately another 'static mobile' antenna though as it's a beast.
Here's mine and this morning I was the only one out of England working Australia on 11 meters-
I'm 6ft2 so you can see how big it is.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
StoatTB

Re: Thunderpole Tank Whip

Post by StoatTB »

I think you'd be hard pressed to get a loaded antenna to outperform a full length quarter wave.
Post Reply