I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

The place to talk about specific radios, equipment and accessories. Do you prefer the latest generation of rigs and antennas or do you like the classics? Discuss it here!
Post Reply
User avatar
WARLOCK
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 1234
Joined: 04 Jun 2008, 08:27
Call Sign: 26TM134
Location: cambridgeshire

I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

Post by WARLOCK » 07 Nov 2018, 08:50

Is the I.MAX 2000 antenna better with the groundplane kit fitted or not ?? any other tips on this antenna please .

User avatar
andrew013
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 1825
Joined: 17 Aug 2010, 12:41
Call Sign: 26AT013
Location: gateshead tyne and wear

Re: I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

Post by andrew013 » 07 Nov 2018, 22:21

from what i read in the past they work better without or defo not needed, tho i do have a groundplane kit stashed away , i think they look wrong being so short on the imax , and after all there only a99 top sections so i have plenty spare if my a99 breaks,when out mobile :-)
on air,tyne&wear,northumberland,durham,holy island,eu120+eu124 and anywhere from gateshead/north wales
scrap uk 40 give cbers L/M/Hcalling on 27.355/555 usb qsy 27.015 lsb/410 usb cb radio is for life not just for profits
i do cb radio not 11mtres,countrys worked 2015 with imax 2000 72

108EH002
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 1495
Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 22:23
Location: 27Mhz Am/Fm/Ssb.

Re: I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

Post by 108EH002 » 08 Nov 2018, 16:53

My Imax bends enough without adding a groundplane kit Warlock so have not tried one,but you could always make one out of thin wire,and that will have less surface area for the wind compared to the thickness of 4 top sections of an a99 ;)
You can talk worldwide on CB = not 10 - 15 miles,
Some are too far up their own @rse to admit it = snobs,
Many freebanders just happen to know otherwise = test free.

-- 27.781.25 Fm --27.555 Usb -- 27.385 Lsb -- 27.315 Fm ---

Prefer to avoid creedy gunts when buying a radio ;)

User avatar
KlondikeMike
Regular
Regular
Posts: 77
Joined: 06 Jan 2014, 03:59
Call Sign: 9WR2000
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Contact:

Re: I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

Post by KlondikeMike » 08 Nov 2018, 18:59

From my understanding, if I was concerned about local contacts, the ground plane kit is beneficial. Although, apparently the radials are to short and you should make up longer ones. If DX is your main objective (of which there will be minimal due to the cycle 24/25 transition), then save your money for something else. There are so many variables to be concerned about as well.

Below is a link to my contact map that I achieved during the peak of last cycle with my IMAX 2000 at 12ft with no ground plane. I purchased the kit but never installed due to physical limitations. I was OK with the results.

http://tinyurl.com/bsl6rxa
9WR2000

User avatar
WARLOCK
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 1234
Joined: 04 Jun 2008, 08:27
Call Sign: 26TM134
Location: cambridgeshire

Re: I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

Post by WARLOCK » 08 Nov 2018, 20:24

Thanks to all who replied , Think i will save my money and spend it on christmas goodies like some new coax , i will need 35mts will mini 8 be ok for this ???

User avatar
ch25
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 469
Joined: 03 Dec 2016, 11:07
Call Sign: n0call
Location: Poland

Re: I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

Post by ch25 » 08 Nov 2018, 20:36

Damn, you didn't put this antenna yet? So much talk, no action....
Mike
You can't have too many antennas...

User avatar
The Collector
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 4946
Joined: 23 Jan 2010, 19:26
Location: Bristol-ish

Re: I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

Post by The Collector » 08 Nov 2018, 20:57

WARLOCK wrote:
08 Nov 2018, 20:24
Thanks to all who replied , Think i will save my money and spend it on christmas goodies like some new coax , i will need 35mts will mini 8 be ok for this ???
Personally I'd get the thickest, baddest MIL stuff you can get if you're going to use about 120ft! Can't you get the aerial (a lot) closer to your radio?

User avatar
WARLOCK
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 1234
Joined: 04 Jun 2008, 08:27
Call Sign: 26TM134
Location: cambridgeshire

Re: I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

Post by WARLOCK » 09 Nov 2018, 10:06

HI would Westtlex 103 be any good to me ???

Tim
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 1180
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 12:35
Call Sign: 26AT239
Location: Democratic Republic of Dartmoor

Re: I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

Post by Tim » 09 Nov 2018, 13:46

Personally I would avoid any coax that is air spaced as it is susceptible to condensation within the spaces with varying temperatures and will fill with water, corrode and will in time find its way into the back of your radio. As for ground planes, these need to be a minimum of 8 feet 6 inches in length and fitted at an angle of 45 degrees, you only need 2 positioned opposite each other but 4 would be better.

User avatar
The Collector
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 4946
Joined: 23 Jan 2010, 19:26
Location: Bristol-ish

Re: I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

Post by The Collector » 09 Nov 2018, 16:09

I'm no expert on co-ax, but always thought the 9/10mm multi-core centre conductor in copper (less likely to suffer metal-fatigue and has more surface area for signals to wrap around the individual wires), with a solid insulator surrounded by a copper shield wrap, followed by a copper outer conductor with as little possible gaps in the diagonal-braiding as possible.

Technology has long since progressed, so this may be 30 years out of date, what with all the modern insulators and possibly things like silver plating on the copper etc ;)

Tim
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 1180
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 12:35
Call Sign: 26AT239
Location: Democratic Republic of Dartmoor

Re: I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

Post by Tim » 09 Nov 2018, 20:51

Again personally I say keep it simple, whatever you read about antennas it's all pretty subjective, work in fractions or multiples of the band you want to use it on, antenna, coax, ground planes and height above the ground, the rest will depend on your position, height ASL, lie of the land, what you have around you in respect of buildings, trees etc. Also a 1:1 SWR does not mean that you have the 'perfect' match, the optimum is, at the closest resonance to 50Ohms you can get will be about 1:4. Some will probably not agree but this is what I have found with the antenna system I use.

User avatar
The Collector
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 4946
Joined: 23 Jan 2010, 19:26
Location: Bristol-ish

Re: I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

Post by The Collector » 09 Nov 2018, 22:39

The lack of any "ugly" ground-plane legs will probably keep your neighbours happier too :)

108EH002
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 1495
Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 22:23
Location: 27Mhz Am/Fm/Ssb.

Re: I.MAX 2000 groundplane kit YES OR NO

Post by 108EH002 » 10 Nov 2018, 08:45

^^ And if you don't like them you can get a better antenna like a S.P.500 with four 1/4 wave ali groundplane legs ;) ^^
You can talk worldwide on CB = not 10 - 15 miles,
Some are too far up their own @rse to admit it = snobs,
Many freebanders just happen to know otherwise = test free.

-- 27.781.25 Fm --27.555 Usb -- 27.385 Lsb -- 27.315 Fm ---

Prefer to avoid creedy gunts when buying a radio ;)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests