Some Raynet activity on 438.4 today. Faint signal here in Birmingham so may be some distance away. Seems to be related to a 'run' of some kind, a reservoir was mentioned.
Update 11:39 — Banbury mentioned.
Update 11:42 — 144.625 also in use, carrying same traffic as 438.4, then changed to 144.65 which he was apparently supposed to have been on in the first place
438.4 Raynet activity
- Minus1
- Top Poster
- Posts: 1222
- Joined: 12 Jun 2011, 11:15
- Location: West Midlands
438.4 Raynet activity
KEY : = channel/stud | ~ = CTCSS/DCS | ^ = transmitter site | ¯ = overhead | * = trunked
- RadioNerdz
- Super Member
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 26 Nov 2010, 19:34
- Call Sign: 2E0
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: 438.4 Raynet activity
438.4 is used with 430.8 as a repeater/TT frequency for RAYNET. 438.4 is the repeater output.
Was most likely this event 'BHF Cycle Ride, Sherwood Pines'.
RN
Was most likely this event 'BHF Cycle Ride, Sherwood Pines'.
RN
-
- Super Member
- Posts: 112
- Joined: 30 Apr 2011, 11:03
Re: 438.4 Raynet activity
Most unlikely if Banbury was mentioned, that event was in Nottinghamshire, not Oxfordshire.RadioNerdz wrote: Was most likely this event 'BHF Cycle Ride, Sherwood Pines'.
RN
- RadioNerdz
- Super Member
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 26 Nov 2010, 19:34
- Call Sign: 2E0
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: 438.4 Raynet activity
Well considering there were only two RAYNET events that day, one in Harrogate the other in Nottinghamshire, one would assume it would be the one in Nottinghamshire!
Please prove otherwise http://www.raynet-uk.net/news/diary.asp
Please prove otherwise http://www.raynet-uk.net/news/diary.asp
- RadioNerdz
- Super Member
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 26 Nov 2010, 19:34
- Call Sign: 2E0
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: 438.4 Raynet activity
That post comes across quite direct, please don't take it personally...
-
- Super Member
- Posts: 112
- Joined: 30 Apr 2011, 11:03
Re: 438.4 Raynet activity
No offence taken. There could have been a lot more events that day, they are not all listed on the Diary pages.RadioNerdz wrote:That post comes across quite direct, please don't take it personally...
It only shows ones that have been notified by the organising Groups.